【視聴数 1099】
【チャンネル名 Kobie M-C】
【タグ 動画,ビデオ,共有,カメラ付き携帯電話,動画機能付き携帯電話,無料,アップロード,チャンネル,コミュニティ,YouTube,ユーチューブ】
ガジェット-youtube動画リンクまとめ ガジェット関係のyoutube動画のリンクをまとめました!ガジェット系のチャンネル探しに便利です!最新の役立つガジェット情報があります!
【視聴数 1099】
【チャンネル名 Kobie M-C】
【タグ 動画,ビデオ,共有,カメラ付き携帯電話,動画機能付き携帯電話,無料,アップロード,チャンネル,コミュニティ,YouTube,ユーチューブ】
「これするだけでおこずかい7000円ゲット!?」中学生でもスマホがあればできる期間限定キャンペーンを利用して7000円分ポイントをゲットする方法がこちらw
【また爆益キター!!】TikTokキャンペーンを利用して簡単に3200円貰う方法がこちらw【期間限定】
Thanks for your perspective on this as a fairly long time user. I’m Not sure how much of a difference it makes for these scenarios, but one scenario which it might is shooting over a croud/ high fence hands extended above your head . In this case it is more difficult to frame , correctly particularly with tele lenses since small differences in camera angle point it to something completely different. It is kind of a niece use case, but happens occasionally.
It’s only an issue for those who want it to be an issue. In the old days (like in silver based films era), we used to do macro and close to the ground or overhead shots without even a screen. The more we have, the more we want…
I hate to disagree with you and Yves. The fixed screen AND THE COST was the deal breaker. Every time you squatted down I thought what would I need to grab to get up. At 75 I have had certain mobility limits sneak up on me. So is a tilt screen a “necessity” maybe not but is one hell of a help. Also from time to time I use a hoodman loupe. The tilt screen makes this much easier. I have not used the K3 III and I accept your observations on angle viewing. The advantages you have covered in other videos might well justify the price but I do not shoot flying birds or other action that demands a fast burst or instant focus so those features did not draw me either. So Yves, it isn’t that I want it to be an issue, it is an issue. Perhaps the viewpoints expressed could be mitigated by consideration of other photographers needs.
It sure can be a major issue Kobie. You try to shoot mushrooms by manual focus stacking – say 20 images – from ground level. I can do this quite well with the tilted screen of my K-1 but also with my K-70 (though less accurate), fixed on a plate or on tripod. In the past, with earlier camera’s having a fixed screen or no screen as in the film era, this could not be done unless with an angle viewer. It was for me a reason not to to buy the K3 III. As for shooting flowers, the use of a tilted screen gives far more accuracy and control of the composition than the point-and-shoot method as you demonstrate here.
Does not see it as a major problem. most people probably have a tilt screen in their pocket if they need one, called a smartphone, if you do not want to lie down when it is wet, you can use the tablet if you want a bigger picture. there are holders for smartphones that you can attach to the flash shoe.
No issue at all. Have K1-ll and A7IV and never use the tilt. Just overestimated by people more interested in features than taking photos.
It would have been nice especially for $2K (or even the $1.7K on sale.) If it had it you wouldn’t have to use it if you hated it. It doesn’t so you can’t even if you really need it.
Tilted screen makes live more easier in lots of situations. And for people who have disabilities, be it from age or sickness it may be a necessity. Of course, K-3 Mk III is not a camera for them in such case, but I wonder how many would like to get it but did not because lack of tilt screen was a deal breaker for them.
Tilting screens are not just for dandelion shots. I do a lot of tabletop stuff with the camera up there on a tripod pointing downwards, copying old photos for example. The screen is _above my eye level_ so it doesn’t matter how wide its viewing angle is. FWIW, in film days I used a “waist level” finder for this work.
Deal breaker for me. Pentax shut out a lot of potential sales with this decision.
Nice try, ha ha…Canon and Fuji are about to announce.Pentax is for 1%ers.
kobie
Call me old fashion if you will .
I rarely use live view instead I rely on Catch-In- Focus for the kind of shots you were taking. It has not failed me yet to get the picture
Thank you for that video and your thoughts and in particular for showing practical examples.
My opinion is based on use of older Pentax cameras (just tried that out with a K-5IIs – I need to practice that) and Olympus cameras (with tilting or fully articulating screen).
A tilting or fully articulating screen undoubtedly adds more comfort and probably makes it significantly easier to take photographs for people with disabilities.
On the other hand: What is the thing of a DSLR in 2022 and the K-3III in particular compared to mirrorless cameras? The optical viewfinder. Pentax emphasised that – and the one in the K-3III is outstanding.
Another point is: most of the tilting or articulating screens are in the size range of 3″. That is not much. So I decided to go for a 5.5″ field monitor, connected via HDMI cable to the camera and there I have a fully articulating screen – for the K-5IIs and the K-3II and probably in the future for the K-3III too.
Hello from the South of France.
Of course we can manage to take pictures without tilting screen. However, it is easier to do it with, especially when focusing staking or using a tripod.
I’m sure Pentax has lost customers. I myself was reluctant to buy the K3 III in part because of that.
At the price charged by Pentax for this camera, it is abnormal that Pentax did not think about the comfort of its customers… even if the reclining screen is not essential.
It’s still the 21st century…
The issue is also about competition in the marketplace. If the K-3iii lacks a feature that everyone else has, their ability to compete declines. Consumers want more choices, not less. For instance, you demonstrated how to focus with the touch screen. That’s a choice shooters might like and makes Pentax more competitive.
I figured for that price the camera it should have had a tilt screen screen I find doing my compositions works so much easier when I can tell the screen that I’m not bent over bent over or laying on the ground looking through the view finder or the screen itself. Does it have the astro tracer or do you have to get the moduleFor the mark 3
Tough sports/wildlife cameras are much better without a tilt screen IMO.
I fail to see how it could be an issue for a hardcore outdoor daytime oriented camera obviously really well suited for long lenses. It’s not a K1. The K1 is for us really fussy night shooting lunatics trying to capture atmosphere that’s impossible to get any other way…
Hi Kobie, I agree with you. I have been taking photos for 6 years with the K-S1, which also does not have a reclining screen. I believe that it is not a discriminating factor not to have a non-reclining screen to choose a K3iii. It will in fact be my next purchase. There are other specifications that I do not like for not choosing other brands. First of all the optical viewfinder and then the tropicalization and the stabilized sensor. Thanks for the video. Peace. Greetings from Italy
I shoot a lot of aviation pictures and the local airport here has a 6 foot high wooden fence in place. Holding the camera in place is not an issue but framing is especially as the screen is fully exposed to ambient light which can completely white out the screen. With my K1 or KP it’s not an issue but that I said I would not part with my K3iii.
I love tilt screens like the K1 and the Olympus EM10. I dislike fully articulating screens but they are better than no tilt at all. It’s a deal breaker for me.