【視聴数 60145】
【チャンネル名 Theoria Apophasis】
【タグ D7500 nikon,new Nikon camera,best nikon DSLR】
ガジェット-youtube動画リンクまとめ ガジェット関係のyoutube動画のリンクをまとめました!ガジェット系のチャンネル探しに便利です!最新の役立つガジェット情報があります!
【視聴数 60145】
【チャンネル名 Theoria Apophasis】
【タグ D7500 nikon,new Nikon camera,best nikon DSLR】
「これするだけでおこずかい7000円ゲット!?」中学生でもスマホがあればできる期間限定キャンペーンを利用して7000円分ポイントをゲットする方法がこちらw
【また爆益キター!!】TikTokキャンペーンを利用して簡単に3200円貰う方法がこちらw【期間限定】
So glad I didn’t buy one and I’m instead going with the d500
I miss the fire place on the monitor come on T
costco right now has the d7500 with 2 lens kit 999.97 good deal in modern mirrorless world ?
Edabbba voice marchara babu
Baboi !!
I have this camera, it’s an incredible camera!
What most of the “reviewers” missed when judging the D7500 that its now again in its own category. Compare it to the D7100/7200, but consider that when those came out there were no real successor to the D300! So those cameras had the role to success the D7k which was the successor of the D90. The D90 was the lower category companion of the D300, just like the D7000. Because Nikon had no intention to release a real successor to the D300 they somewhat upscaled the D7100 and 7200 to more or less substitute the never released D400. Those two cameras had to replace the D7k and the D300 at the same time. This is the reason they got dual SD slots for example. But when the D500 released its lower end companion shouldn’t need to fill both shoes. Comparing the D7500 to the D7100 and 7200 is just wrong. You should compare it to the D7k in respect of their place in the market. The D7k was partially a replacement for the D300, but it was much closer to the D90 line then the D300. Meanwhile the D7100 and 7200 were placed much more closer to the D300 category. BTW D7k was announces at $1499.
It’s a great camera. I’ve had it for almost a year now. Perfect ergonomics. Fast and decent burst. Never had SD failure. Great low light. Nice fast touchscreen. Feels solid and I’m sure it can take a beating.
The biggest failure on the D7500 that I see is the single card slot, yet the premium price. I mean the D7200 I believe was either as expensive or cheaper, and it has a higher resolution and a second card slot (not to mention the option for a vertical grip, which for some, is important). Today (2021) I’d say unless you want a tad faster AF but are willing to give up 3MP, a battery grip option and a second card slot, go for the D7500. But if not, then get the D7200, not to mention used you can find them for about $600-700 in decent shape. Luckily, the D7500 now is about $1000 but still, with a single card slot, it’s hard to recommend. At least it does employ the newer Expeed 5 processor and some of the D500 AF routines but only 51 AF points.
It was explained to me though that the reason they did away with the second card slot is because they wanted to differentiate it more from the D500, which has two card slots (although one is an XQD card slot–at least it has two). I mean I guess this makes sense…. a little since the only real other big difference would be 51 vs 153 focus points and the option fro a grip (again, of which many people may not care about).
And having lost images in the past, It’s hard for me to buy a system with a single SD card slot these days. Single XQD? Sure, I’m OK with that because they’re more reliable, but not a single SD card slot.
The high-end pro DSLRs don’t lose their value over time, and to an extent, their pro-sumer DSLRs (FF) also don’t either (like the D600 and D800 series). The D4/D5 are overpriced to begin with and you can find a D810 for example for about $1200 in reasonable shape, but to get a good one, you’re looking at around $1800 still (new I think they were close to $3000 about 6 years ago). And to an extent, the D7200 is still about $700 for a decent one (used) but as low as about $550 for one in fair, but working condition.
That being said, I think if you want the best value and performance in a pro-sumer DX body that was around $1000, get the D7200. I say this even 5 years later after its introduction. Still a great camera. Offers plenty of resolution and decent high ISO noise control (probably not as good as the D7500 or D500) but given it’s price point now (used) it’s not a bad value. Dual card slots, battery grip option, you can use old AF-D/AI lenses on it (has the focus motor in the body), etc.
I got mine for $699 the body only version as a upgrade from my D3200. 4k ability with a great processor with the D500 cmos sensor for excellent image quality. 8fps for 33 raw shot is more than enough for my shooting style and I prefer the 51 autofocus system personally as I hate having too much like Canon camera gives you. As a full photography only camera, this camera I agree wouldn’t be optimal for the price but if you consider videography into the mix, you got something useful.
Here is for me personally a *nice to have and not a need to have:*
Good Autofocus
Dual card slot
Dual battery capabilities like a battery grip
Shooting 20fps
They gave you 4K with this camera. The D7100 and D7200 don’t have that and they also don’t shoot at that 8fps. So there’s that. Why all the bitching about it🤣🤣 Nikon knows it doesn’t need to continue to release cameras that are identical with every feature so they change things. You want 4K in a crop camera with 8fps, then buy the D7500. You want Dual Card slots, AI lens capabilities and 6fps, and just HD video then buy the D7100 or D7200. It’s that simple.
Really nice sir…a lot of information
shut up boomer