【視聴数 6633】
【チャンネル名 ArtoftheImage】
【タグ photography,photo,photographer,4K video,videographer,pic,camera,digital camera,DSLR,4K Ultra,Nikon D7500,D7500,articulated lcd,lcd screen,d7500 lcd,nikon,nikon dslr,nikon d7200,nikon d7100,nikon 4k,Nikon D500,D500】
I totaly agree with you. BTW, thanks for Nikon D7500, which i had waited its announce for a year, i decide to buy Fujifilm X-T2.
Agreed with you on first point. But generally with flipout screens, so many buttons not possible – the button count will fall.
Regarding 2nd, APS-C maxes out at 24MP, FF maxes out at 47/50MP. That is the highest they can go without causing diffraction at f8 and higher apertures. With higher megapixel counts, f8 will be unusable, and at still higher f5.6 will also become unusable.
That is the issue overlooked by even experts (like Matt Granger) with the newly released 8k video camera with APS-H sized sensor (red…helium camera)
Can you make a video about the 7d mark iii and what you think the specs will be
Agree with you that hobbyists and enthusiast photographers who would look at the D7XXX series want quick access to buttons over a flip screen. Nikon is further driving a wedge between amateurs who want a good camera, D5XXX, and those who are willing to pay for those D500 features. For those who just want a nice family camera I would recommend the FX D610 well before the D7XXX. Who cares about megapixels in a DX. You are looking at cameras that are more than double the price of the D7500 that are appreciably higher; I consider anything in the 20-24 range about the same). And those are FX sensors to keep pixel pitch similar; which has it’s pluses, especially for portrait and landscape, and pitfalls, sports and wildlife lens prices.
Enthusiasts never get this sensor thing. Simple rule of thumb, if it has high resolution high ISO then its a prosumer model; yes the D810 is a prosumer model, the D500 has better native signal to noise. If it has low pixel count then it is a professional model. Nikon never talks about this because it would open a can of worms they dont want to discuss. They play on the prejudices of enthusiast photographers who want more resolution. D5 and D500 are their flagship models, their centenary birthday silver treats; they are 20MP. They dont rely on high ISO, its nothing to do with speed but they will tell you it is. Its about Image Quality. The 20MP sensors are light buckets, you dont have to boost teh signal and remove noise which will degrade quality (that is what high ISO means, a processed image), the image is good straight from the sensor. the Higher pixel models are boosted and cleaned up. What do you call a high resolution high end camera? Medium Format. There really is no way round the physics, signal to noise is mostly dependent on pixel area not sensor size. What Nikon cameras have teh biggest pixel area, their flagship models. Nikon’s reputation is based on their top pro models and they have to have the best IQ. Doesnt really matter what Nikon say, you can see what they do 😉
even the d3000 series has more mpx than the d500. resolution is not everything
Given the D7500 is essentially a brand new design I see no reason why Nikon couldn’t have implemented a fully articulated screen at the point of conception. If they had built a D7300 instead it would likely have been based around the chassis of the existing D7200/D7100 neither of which had such screens. It makes economical sense in that situation to use an existing body design to keep production and development costs down. Regards the sensor choice, well again to keep costs down they had to raid their existing parts bin. Developing a totally new APSC 30MP sensor just for this model would not be cost effective. It would also have impacted the fps, a 30MP sensor is going to need a huge buffer. My impression is that you would have preferred the D7500 to have been an APSC version of the D810, in which case a 30MP sensor would make sense. Clearly that was not the D7500’s design brief. It is intended to be a baby D500 and in that regard it sort of hits the spot. If a D7300 is ever released perhaps that 30MP sensor will see the light of day 😛
ur videos sucks
Interesting views after having posed questions. I still believe that many photographers would choose external buttons over a flip out screen if it came down to one or other. Even if touch screen was deployed. Give me physical buttons any day! For me I would not use such a camera for vlogging (not that I do anyway). Too big and heavy. There are also many work arounds using an app together with a phone, tablet or external monitor that means such a flip out screen not a deal breaker and there are disadvantages to a screen that goes outwards sideways. As for higher max count yes concede others have had higher mpx counts. It’s about quality (size, light gathering, etc) versus quantity. Thanks for airing my thoughts Matt.
I am soooo confused. Nikon! Why I oughta! Okay, had to get that out. As far as the build, features, buttons, et al .. that, to me, depends *entirely* on what Nikon had in mind for this camera in terms of product lineup. That D90 resolution flippy touch screen thingy is blowin’ my fuses. I’m beginning to think the market will see no more iterations of the D5xxx/D3xxx lineup and at the 100th Anniversary there will be a D7600/D7700 (actual upgrades to D7100/D7200) to seal up the pro-sumer DX offerings which will have the D7500 as the lowest price/feature offering.
But then again, what do I know. Did I mention the confused part. ;(
junk and a failure. sad
One of the lovely things about the Nikon Pros body is the button placement so you can pick up D5, D200 or D810 and most of the button are in the same place. As camera are just tools and as a photographer with a number of different camera it just make thing simpler and nicer to uses. Although most of my camera are now on the older side (Like me :() I have Nikon D700’s D800e and D750 and at time I will be on a shoot and switching between the D800e and the D700 great but with the D750 I differently slow down in a bad way. I that is one of the main reasons that I just do not like the D750 at all. So back to your fully articulating screen there is an issue with changing the button layout. But whether it is possible to redesign the hinge in a strong and usable way that would be interesting. As far as the higher meg camera like the D810 vs the D5 they are both different tools and as such amend at different markets i a photographer shoot product and landscape the D810 is the tool for you, but as a lot of photographer shoot action then seen is what they are looking for the D5 is the tool. This is only is you are a Nikon shooter. If you shoot video then Canon, Sony and Panasonic may be better but they are all just tools to do a job.
Megapixel is a function of frame rate and processor speed. For a camera of D5 league, if you make it higher megapixel camera, the fps will not stay the same unless you get a processor can transfer enormous data to the storage card. The reason why D500 is a lower megapixel camera is to capture action (10 fps). D500 is not a portrait camera. Bodies like D810 and D7200 are more in the category of portrait cameras.
At this point, I don’t even know what Nikon is doing…or perhaps the whole camera industry for that matter.
they didn’t want to change the design of the camera moving the buttons would change the camera too much. I love the nikon 7000 series now I can’t even talk about it
Matt Granger and others have suggested that the D75oo is not the upgrade to the D72oo, that there will be a higher megapixel count maybe pro body to come. The crop sensor version of the D810. Perhaps Nikon restructuring is still in it’s infancy…..
i just got the D7500 and i really like it
It seems to me that Nikon did a balancing game with this; affordability was the key here. If you’re like me, you’re glad that body wasn’t more expensive, especially since it isn’t full frame.