【視聴数 64201】
【チャンネル名 Max Tech】
【タグ m2 max vs m2 ultra,mac studio,mac studio 2023,2023 mac studio,mac studio review,mac mini vs mac studio,mac studio vs mac pro,mac pro,benchmarks,Cinebench r23,Geekbench 6,Metal,xcode,Logic,Adobe,Lightroom,Photoshop,Final Cut Pro,Fcp,fcx,Resolve 18,Davinci,RAW,RED,8K,ProRes,Prores RAW,4K video editing,SSD,test,comparison,Figma,blackmagic,speed,performance,student,Blender,3D Design,coding,gaming,3d Mark wildlife,GFX Bench,30 vs 60 core,76 core,38 core】
For 3d modeling, 24/7 gpu rendering, none will buy a $6,199.00 AIO workstation. You can’t attach egpus to increase the rendering performance, you have to buy another M2 Ultra unit to make a gpu distributed rendering over the network. With the same price you can build a modular system with two RTX4080s. If one gpu will fail you’ll replace it or you will add a new updated model.
This tiny box is not made for who professionally work in the 3d-rendering market. Blender, Cinema 4D, Maya, UE users will continue to make renders on heavy and looking bad pc rigs.
Oh man, another one of those “is it worth” videos, it’s getting boring. It must be realized that the more expensive Apple products become, the less they are worth, especially when I compare them to devices that are half the price or even products from other companies. In this respect, such videos make little sense, except to show the willing buyer beforehand that he is about to throw money out the window.
What happened with Xcode graph? 0:67 is 1:07. Or is it a typo and it’s 0:57 actually?
WTAF! The new benchmark is being able to edit 8k raw? haha!
I’d like to see M2 Ultra vs M1 Ultra direct comparison (unless you’ve done it already and I missed it).
You can build a much faster 13900KS PC with Nvidia 4090 for the less money than M2 Ultra Mac Studio.
4:55 This graph is *very* unintuitive.
Since it’s measured in minutes and seconds, why is the Ultra 0.67 and not 1.07?
Or, if it’s somehow not accounting a minute as 60 seconds, does it means the Ultra is 67% of a minute?
Whatever that is, it’s not the first time I see this in your videos
I’m not a Keynote user, and thus might be missing something, but comparing times on a per 60 seconds scale shouldn’t ever read past 0.59…
what about premiere…?? 😀
Hey it’s time to stop using the gaming element to your review it’s absolutely not relevant . Do you actually use it aside from video editing and tuning benchmarks ? You never do real life reviews
I have doubts about the Logic Pro benchmark, are you sure you ran both machines on a 1024 buffer as the instructions suggest? It seems crazy to see such a difference and also that my basic M1 Pro mbp does more tracks that M2 max Mac Studio. Could you please check? Thanks
Please add the following tests in future to be interesting for PROs:
1) machine learning performance
a) stable diffusion image creation
b) SD model training
c) LLM performance
d) LLM model training
2) live streaming performance
a) OBS
b) mimoLive
Your math callouts are completely misleading. “43% difference”? Difference of what? Using your math, if the Ultra was in fact double the performance, the “difference” would be only 50%! You are sensationalizing the nonlinear differences. The ultra should be 100% faster not 50. Therefore when you say 43%, it sounds like it is shy by 58%. Not true. It’s only shy by 14% (7% times 2, based on your scaling). It’s like saying “two times slower.” There’s no such thing. It’s half as fast, not two times slower!
Would LOVE some After Effects and Premiere testing. As others have noted, export times are great indicators of overall power, but doing some testing in a timeline/sequence with background tasks or lots of effects to process would be a great real-world use test. Loved the vid last cycle when you threw those Premiere comparisons in…
Thank you!! That was really helpful and saves me a good amount of money. 🥳
to the listeners that care. im above average at math, so when he said “a 45 percent difference” aye 3:20, my brain immediately said, thats incredibly off. in actuality, its closer to 70 percent between the ultra and the max at 3:20. Still not double, but closer to double than he gives it credit for
I’m thinking about upgrading to an ultra from an intel iMac which just can’t handle the new array of files from a Z9 – raw, 8k etc and these files give you so much freedom in post. Just a two day shoot creates at least 2TB by the time everything is rendered in FCP. It strikes me that cameras will continue to improve so I need something that has some kind of future proofing. Added to this, by the time you have some clients files that you need at all times it’s the SSD that’s a really important consideration. If you have two or three project on the go at any one time 4Tb doesn’t go very far because you need some headroom. Any thoughts from video makers/editors?
Watch band ?😎
I can’t stand watching your comparisons anymore. You keep assuming that if the price of one system is double the price of another then the speeds will also be double. That simply isn’t the case. Your entire premise of these comparison videos are flawed. The price increase is including double the built in (non-expandable RAM). Storage speeds. Bandwidth. Port types. Peripheral capacity and monitor support. Core count. Essentially expanding the life of this unit for professionals who require its performance. And right now, in this period of time it is getting about 45% speed increase in many of the “standard” tests. You ought to start creating some truly exactly test scenarios yourself and put your test subjects through these instead of just repeating the geek bench stuff over and over.
Coming from a 5 year old PC-my Ultra is a badass.
After a few projects it will be paid off, then time for the next one. It’s a tool for business
My old MacBook Pro with the M1 Pro chip has a similarly fast SSD as the M2 Ultra. I’m glad to have it.