【視聴数 172129】
【チャンネル名 MobileTechReview】
【タグ 15-inch MacBook Pro review,15-inch MacBook pro touch bar review,Apple MacBook Pro 15 with touch bar review,Apple laptop review,MacBook review,Touch bar,MacBook pro 2016 review,Intel Skylake i7 CPU,AMD graphics,AMD Radeon 450,AMD Radeon 455,2TB SSD,16GB Max RAM,Thunderbolt 3 ports,Apple butterfly keyboard,15.4-inch 2880 x 1800 display,13-inch MacBook Pro review,quad core CPU,Retina Display,OLED】
There are very decent (If pricey) dongles that allows you to get all but the VGA port back and power your machine leaving 3 other ports to do whatever. You can hook up 3 4K monitors on this so yeah it is a Pro Laptop. Remember the ports are supportThunderbolt 3. You are future proof and you can find decent alternatives today. By the way the Surface Studio Pro has USB 3 but no Thunderbolt 3 so the MBP is more future proof and pro on that level.
courage lol. next macbook pro will come without a screen!
Nothing Pro about this Mac. Not even an SD card slot. Not enough ports. Creativity just got harder. Apple made the most awesome $2500.00 incomplete computer ever. I call this the Tim Cook, oh, and just one less thing, vs. Steve Jobs who always adds to his product, and gave it what we wanted. Apple is lost along with the dongles we will lose, or forget. Windows side is looking better. Nice job Apple.
25% of last years battery size shaved off to save 4mm…I would have preferred them keep that and at the same time kept the old 50W of GPU allowable TDP, rather than that going down to 35W GPUs, though it’s still a very nice machine, price hike aside.
I don’t need swappable cpu or dual GPU in an MBP but this has gone too far. For my 2008 MBP, I upgraded RAM twice, the HD twice then went to 500GB SSD, and even tinkered with express cards, adding USB 3.0 (before OSX 10.9 broke it but for good reason.) If only they’d use cutting-edge design in a normal body for a general laptop. They could school them on heat/power efficiency with what they’ve learned plus the battery could be massive!
great video. any chance you can run the BruceX benchmark for FCPX. AppleInsider channel ran it on their macbook pro with the 460, I’m curious to see if there’s much of a difference between that one and the 450/455.
https://blog.alex4d.com/2013/10/30/brucex-a-new-fcpx-benchmark/
for the freaking cost it should come with some adapters..
Why can you plug an android phone into it, but not an iPhone?
Needs Nividia
GIVEAWAY??
She says 15.5 meters at 0:22 😂 That’s a huge laptop😁
Blame Intel for the 13″s different Thunderbolt speeds on each side – dual core Skylake only has 10 PCI-E lanes to work with, 4 went to the SSD since it was faster than 2 would allow, leaving four to one side, two to the other side.
eventually the macbook will have no ports and everything will have to be wireless
I don’t get why the trackpad is bigger either – rumour was it was getting bigger to support Pencil, which would make sense, but then they introduced it without Pencil support and little reason to be half sitting under your palms.
Thanks for the great review Lisa!
Thanks Lisa. I don’t see the written review up yet. Will it show more of the benchmarks you did?
Btw, I’ve also found drag+drop more difficult since the move to Force Touch.
great vid 😀
This product is a FAIL.
I think the sound and video aren’t synced at the beginning Lisa.
Fantastic as always.
The thing that I find is a nice touch, that no one is really mentioning, is that the hinge covering looks like it’s now aluminum, like the rest of the laptop, instead of that black plastic. Not only does it look nice, but that won’t break over time, like my old one was slowly doing, and I’m sure other’s did when they of course dropped it. Not nice enough to make me leave my SP4, but still a nice laptop. That usb C transition will be tough for some people.
Also, apple removed the extension cord from the box as well…….
Lisa, I think the processors are not the same as in the dell XPS 15. From what I read, these have an 8MB L3 cache compared to a 6MB L3 cache on the dell xps 15. Just better binned processors ? (in terms of the cache banks being functional)