【視聴数 715618】
【チャンネル名 CNET】
【タグ CNET,Technology,News,Tech,Review,apple,bose,noise cancelling,bose 700,700,headphones,bose headphones,bose 700 headphones,noise cancelling headphones,price,design,drivers,review,first look,hands on,quietcomfort,quiet comfort,quietcomfort 35,vs,versus,size,ear cups,bluetooth headphones,alexa,touch controls,siri,google assistant,battery life,quick charge,headphone review,wireless headphones】
What a magnificent product, I cant wait to put my hands on the satin black version to match my setup!
I just bought the b&o e8 2.0….i should have waited….
Omg Dr. Wells!
LOL. My Sony WH-1000X M3 headphones are way better.
Yep still not as good as Sony
It looks like they have done a nice improvement but wish the price were not that high.
Everyone joking about the apple monitor stand and here I am thinking about buying one to tape a microphone in it and flex it as the most expensive microphone stand.
“Slightly better sound”? That’s your review? What kind of information is that.
Also – this is a terrible review. It feels like the person who was meant to do this video called in sick and you had to cover at the very last second.
My first $350 bose headphones lasted 4 years of very light use, only on flights. And the audio was actually worse on the ground so I didn’t use it. But hey, reviewers need to sell advertising to these companies.
With these out….the QC35’s should drop about a 100 bones! QC35’s become a steal at this point! I don’t like the style of these! Just saying!
What bluetooth? Aptx HD?
Biggest problem with over the ear, is phone calls seem unnatural can’t hear yourself speaking. I switch to plantronics for calls, Bose for media only.
Bad design
If you want real noise cancelling just go deaf you won’t hear a thing
More like promotion video for the Bose 700
Cover the Bose logo and all you see is a Microsoft product
Nah man I don’t like this design
Wtf. Ill just keep my urbanears which i couldnt destroy for last 5 years.
But how good are they really at true noise cancelling? I’ve tried various versions from various manufacturers over the last 20 years or so and have never been impressed with any of them. They’ve all been more about reducing rather than cancelling, and that’s not just being pedantic, if you’re claiming cancellation then reducing by 50% doesn’t meet that claim. I want a pair of true noise *cancelling* headphones which, upon putting them on, I stop hearing the noises from outside (e.g. yapping dog, crying baby, hammering, etc). I shouldn’t even need to be listening to music through them to assist the noise reducing.
I think there should be some kind of metric that can be applied to any headphones that make these claims. They could have a fake test head and have microphones inside the head’s fake ears and measure the noise volume (to the mic-ears) of the outside noise with no headphones on, then with the headphones on but not yet active, and then the with them active. You’d get figures like 0% for test 1, maybe 5-20% reduction for on-but-not-enabled, and then a final reading for when the noise cancelling is enabled.
When you’re buying a car you can compare speeds, trunk volume, and fuel economy. Why can’t we compare metrics for noise cancelling headphones too.