【視聴数 30691】
【チャンネル名 CNET】
【タグ CNET,Technology,tech,apple,apple headseet,apple vr headset,apple ar vr headset,Apple VR,Apple VR/AR headset,Apple mixed reality headset,Apple Reality Pro,Apple WWDC 2023,Apple VR/AR headset features,Apple VR/AR headset release date,Apple VR/AR headset price,Apple VR/AR headset rumors,apple news,apple vr headset news,apple vr headset rumors,apple virtual reality,apple vr,apple ar,apple vr/ar】
For Sports: This headset would likely be much cheaper than season tickets, flights and hotels to every game of a particular team or league. But if you add Apple’s special icing on the cake with sports stats and group FaceTime, it may become a thing! It certainly can just start as a “fan seat view” though.
Analogy to Apple Watch: Spot on! They are going to try to make this thing offer a taste of every experience in VR to see what sticks. I can’t live without Walkie-Talkie. I control most of Homekit stuff with Siri on the Watch vs my iPhone or Tablet. I use it for quick calls, I need it for pulse monitoring, check my solar production, who’s ringing the doorbell, etc. And others in my family use the Watch for countless other things I don’t even consider. So yeah, they will do the same to see what VR can do for as many people as possible. Then once they know, they’ll focus all resources on making “those” experience better.
VR vs AR: If there are exterior cameras than can re-transmit the outside world and superimpose VR then this device will be a perfect development tool to get ready for the AR glasses which I am guessing is what most would prefer.
Favorite line: “When you got the tech and the media, you can mess with the brain!” 1000% true
My biggest concerns are:
1) power requirements. Rumored 2 hr battery pack is a no bueno for me unless $3k gets you a headset with 2 packs.
2) feeling tethered. I want more freedom of movement with new experiences; not less. This thing needs to be iterated into something smaller, lighter and more mobile as quickly as possible.
Aw man! Apple VR, Facebook VR… (aside from playstation) is there ever going to be any GOOD companies jumping into VR?
VR is not taking off because there’s just not enough good content.
Slow news day?
Find my iPhone is the killer app for your apple watch. Thank you for validating my silently held opinion until now.
I say that the Apple glasses would work really good for people who are vision impairment, and it would be very useful for the medication that is on Apple. .
Should be noted that Apple acquired NextVR. They hosted a variety of content, like documentaries, VR documentaries, live comedy and sporting events. NextVR had a deal with the NBA, the NHL and other leagues for live VR events and VR recaps.
Personally, I’m all for watching VR with front seat perspective. Having depth in watching amazing plays and having the ability to watch beyond the broadcast camera’s POV makes all the difference to me.
Let’s start with this terrible idea. Throw pasta at the wall to see what sticks is what a company does when it doesn’t have a plan in mind or in place. VR has been looking for its place in the world for close to 30 years now. It has only found a home with limited success in a few areas but not enough for the revolution that has been promised. Meta has quietly killed its VR world. Maybe Apple will realize that VR’s time is not now, and it may never come as they have envisioned it. There have been so many so-called technological breakthroughs that ended up in the dustbin of history VR could ultimately end up there.
You do a great job in these videos!
What I have is not VR it even say it on the website it’s just a regular big screen movie theater size tv looking through it does everything the movie theater does
If I can play video games while holding our one year old & do it while walking around the house avoiding obstacles. I’m interested.
1. It must weight less than 1/4 of the weight of current VR headsets for useability.
2. It must have at least near-retina resolution displays for useability.
3. It must be powerful to do meaningful and impressive things, so it won’t be considered a toy and will show the true capabilities of the technology.
4. Its selling point is immersion, so everything needs to be immersive. immersive Facetime, immersive computing, immersive movies, immersive games… taking everything that existed before in 2D screens and showing their 3D versions.
5. It needs to look sexy and sleek.
And one way it won’t: $3000 VR Headset
Spaghetti at the wall is exactly why Quest sucks as a user experiemce
I was hoping to see Apple Glasses before the VR headset, which would make more sense. Apple should test the waters with something like Apple Glasses and then develop that concept further when it comes to a full VR headset.
They will do what everyone else is doing but they will put an “i” in front of the name and charge twice what the competitors are charging.
gIvE mE MoRe DuNe WiTh My DuNe
Love CNET ❤️
for 3k… wich cost even more on other countries… It has to be THE best beta product ever.
This bait and switch will fall flat. The sleek glasses to wear all the time (bait) switched to a basic copy of what even facebook can’t sell… short the stock